So, y'all tell me which one of these little boys is the prettiest one you've ever seen.
Ever.
I am quite sure that one of them is, and I know it's a close call, but go ahead on and be honest.
I was showing this picture I stumbled upon on the worldwide computer that reminded me so much of one of my boys to The Mrs., and she said, "Wow, they could be twins."
Well, maybe they couldn't quite be twins, but when I saw one of 'em, it sure sparked a memory.
So, just go ahead on and be honest. Which one of these little rascals is the prettiest little boy you've ever seen?
Boy #1:
Boy #2:
If you don't want to vote in this highly scientific poll, it's all good. But, at least you got to see two of the most beautiful boys ever to be born.
Ever.
I shall disqualify myself from the voting. But I WILL say Boy #1 is a CUTIE!
ReplyDeleteNyuk! I'll count your vote anyway...because I know whichun' it is.
ReplyDeleteI wouldn't touch that one with a ten foot pole! They both seem to be turning on the charm in hope of getting my vote though!
ReplyDeleteI wouldn't touch that one with a ten foot pole! They both seem to be turning on the charm in hope of getting my vote though!
ReplyDeleteI give 1/2 point to Boy 1 and 1/2 point to Boy 2. They both rate pretty darn high on the Cute-o-meter!
ReplyDeleteMaybe I should run for office.
Maybe I should run for office.
ReplyDeleteYou gots MY vote.
It would be easier to tell if they were holding their PURSES. Pretty boys? Must be an east Texan thing.
ReplyDeleteJust so you know, my boy was the ugliest baby in history.
Jim, you are a smart man...stay clear of the proud papa deal...like I said, you are a smart man.
ReplyDeleteMoogie, I'm gonna agree with Buck. You would get my vote for sure. In fact, I was planning on voting for you tomorrow for Lieutenant Goober of Louisiana, but I noticed that you forgot to turn your qualification papers in.
I reckon I'll have to settle on voting for Sammy. I could "write in" MoogieP, though. I'm gonna have to sleep on that one.
Paul, for some reason I totally believe you about your boy. However, I have seen pitchers of him as a man, and he don't look half bad to be your kinfolk.
Even though only one of these younguns is an East Texan, you did pretty good spotting that!
I'm a woman so I allowed to change my mind at will, so....
ReplyDeleteBaby one. No, baby two. No, baby one. No, baby two. No, baby one. Rinse, wash, repeat....
:)
I'll plead the Fifth, because both are heart-stopping with the cuteness.
ReplyDeleteThey're NOT twins??
ReplyDeleteBoth are, really, cute. But, if I've to choose then I WILL say Boy #1 is my choice.
ReplyDeleteLemon, good answer! Thanks for stopping by. Have you been posting lately, or is my Google Reader misfiring?
ReplyDeleteDave, fabulous answer!
Staci: No, they aren't. In fact, they are the sons of two different Moms & Pops, and the photos are separated by 17 or so years.
But, what Dave said...
If I put a pic of my blonde boy, he would be the cutest ever.
ReplyDelete